Is Losing What’s Best for Coleman?

Aaron Keyak — April 3, 2009 – 1:17 pm | Democrats | Obama Comments (0) Add a comment

On Monday, I wrote a post, “What is Best for Coleman?” It looks like I left out an important part of what’s “best” for Coleman. I neglected to take into account, “even if Norm Coleman pulls off a miracle win in his Senate race/trial/appeal against Al Franken, he’d be so besieged by investigations that he might wish he hadn’t.”

JTA’s Eric Fingerhut does a good write-up of Politico’s “Coleman faces hot seat even if he wins.”

Here’s an excerpt from Fingerhut’s piece:

Then again, since three out of the four investigations will still occur whether Coleman is in the Senate or not, I’m not sure how much difference it makes to Coleman whether he’s in Washington or Minnesota. As for it being used against Republicans in the 2010 election, that’s making what appears to be a pretty big assumption at this point—that this recount will actually be resolved 18 months from now.

Furthermore, one would think Coleman would be emboldened by this week’s decision by the Justice Department to drop the corruption case against former Sen. Ted Stevens.

The biggest obstacle for Norm Coleman still remains that he still doesn’t seem to have enough votes.

The first few paragraph’s from “Coleman faces hot seat even if he wins.”

Even if Norm Coleman pulls off a long-shot legal victory in the extended Minnesota Senate race, Democrats are vowing to make him wish that he hadn’t.

Separate and apart from the ongoing legal dispute over November’s election, the Minnesota Republican faces several unresolved investigations: a reported FBI probe into his dealings with Nasser Kazeminy, a friend and benefactor; a potential Senate Ethics Committee inquiry into his Capitol Hill living arrangements; a federal elections investigation into his use of campaign donations for legal expenses; and a possible state probe into his campaign’s handling of donors’ financial information on its website.

“Coleman would almost be better off if he lost,” said David Schultz, a professor at Hamline University in St. Paul. “Should he win, he faces a host of legal and other issues in the Senate. He would enter the Senate with the Kazeminy case shadowing him, and that would almost certainly produce an ethics investigation.”

J.B. Poersch, executive director of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, says he plans to make Coleman’s problems an issue against Republican incumbents in next year’s midterm elections.

“These are really serious ethical issues, and the longer Republicans entangle themselves with someone like Coleman, the more damage he does to them,” Poersch told POLITICO. “We’re going to bring them up anyway, but they would be better off if he was out of the Senate.”

Click here to read the rest of the Politico post and here to see the entire JTA post.

Comments

There are no comments for this entry